The conflicting rulings create significant legal and operational challenges for DHS, which must navigate between compliance with two contradictory orders. States like Florida and Ohio argue that access to the SAVE system is critical for ensuring non-citizens are not improperly registered to vote or issued professional licenses. On the other hand, privacy advocates, including the League of Women Voters, warn that expanded use of the SAVE system could lead to privacy violations and the wrongful removal of US citizens from voter rolls. The stakes are high, as the outcome could set a precedent for how federal databases are used in state-level immigration and voter verification processes.